Hi, On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:54:13PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Hello Andrei, > > On 08/10/2015 11:34 PM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > [snip] > > >>>>> > >>> > >>> That would definitely be the preferate way but would involve some > >>> additional > >>> work in tracking the patches. So, as an initial state, I am fine with a > >>> different kernel recipe (with a different name). > >>> > >> > >> Ok, I was waiting for your feedback before preparing v2. > > > > I guess this is my feedback. We can go on a separate linux provider for now. > > Something like linux-raspbery-vc.bb . Or, if you want to maintain the > > patches > > we can only pull in patches and apply them on top of 4.X based on a FEATURE. > > What do you think? > > > > Yes, sorry I meant that I didn't post a v2 before because I was waiting for > you but now I've all your feedback from your previous emails. I agree that > is better to have a separate recipe (with all the patches unconditionally > applied) and drop the feature for now. > > Is just that I was busy today with other stuff but I'll post a v2 this week > for sure!
No rush Javier. Just keep it in queue. -- Andrei Gherzan -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
