Hello Andrei, On 08/10/2015 01:05 AM, Andrei Gherzan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 08:59:56AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Hello Khem, >> >> On 08/06/2015 04:54 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas >>> <jav...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: >>>>> who defines the distro feature ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Distro features AFAICT are user defined options, you can for example have >>>> the following in your conf/local.conf: >>>> >>>> DISTRO_FEATURES_append = " vc4-gfx" >>> >>> I wasnt trying to learn about what DISTRO_FEATURES are, I was trying >>> to draw attention to the fact that meta-rpi being a BSP layer >> >> Ok, sorry. But I believe it's more productive to just do suggestions >> instead of asking rhetorical questions that can be misunderstood :-) >> >>> was trying to define a lot more than a BSP layer is supposed to do. So >>> if its a distro feature, I would like it to work as expected on other >>> machines besides raspberrypi. If thats not applicable then we should >>> rethink if it could be folded into MACHINE_FEATURES if it needs to be >> > > Khem definitely has a very good point. Maybe his way of putting it in words > was > not that productive. But the core idea was definitely right: I don't want rpi > layer to introduce distro features. >
Agreed. After Khem answers and reading about the MACHINE and DISTRO in the documentation, I understood that the changes were not correct. Thanks a lot to both of you for the clarification. > -- > Andrei Gherzan > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
