On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Brian Hutchinson <b.hutch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On May 14, 2015 6:08 PM, "Denys Dmytriyenko" <de...@denix.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:35:20AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> > On 2015-05-12 10:20 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: >> > >On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield >> > ><bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> wrote: >> > >>On 2015-05-11 02:10 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>>On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield >> > >>><bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>>It is plausible. But in theory, linux-dummy should still provide >> > >>>>what you need (but since it doesn't build anything, there is >> > >>>>no abi .. and no modules can be built against it) .. so the >> > >>>>error isn't graceful. >> > >>>> >> > >>>>Bruce >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>>I can confirm this same problem is happening to me. I just updated >> > >>>one of my builds from 1.7 to 1.8 and am also getting my rootfs to >> > >>> fail >> > >>>due to no abi kernel version: >> > >> >> > >> >> > >>We still have a race condition in the 1.8 branch for the population >> > >>of the build-artifacts directory. >> > >> >> > >>If modules start building, they'll race against the population of the >> > >>abiversion, and you may see that message. >> > >> >> > >>There's a proposed patch for master, but I don't think it is in >> > >>fido yet. >> > >> >> > >>Bruce >> > > >> > >Hi Bruce, >> > > >> > >I did some searches and looks like there are a number of 'race' >> > >condition fixes but it wasn't obvious which one I may need. Is it >> > >this one: >> > >> > > >http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=02d0a003d603266114512160b209876199241e98 >> > > >> > >> > That's the one that should make sure that the shared workdir >> > (Which has the abiversion) is in place before building any modules. >> > >> > I can't say that it is exactly your issue, but it is the change >> > I was thinking of. >> >> Brian, >> >> Were you able to try the above mentioned commit against am180x in meta-ti? >> Did >> it solve the missing abi kernel version? Thanks. >> >> -- >> Denys > > Hi Denys, > > No, I got caught up in something else ... I'll try it tomorrow and report > back after I cherry pick that commit Bruce mentioned. > > Regards, > > Brian
Update. Not sure if I did this right but this is what I did. I added master as a remote and cherry picked 02d0a003d603266114512160b209876199241e98. Next I just went for it and tried to bitbake my image again and got the same result as before. Next I did a bitbake cleanall on virtual/kernel and tried to make my image again and still got the same result. I'm going to leave this build as is and setup a new one using 1.8 master and see if I get the same thing again. I'll leave this broken build alone for a while in case someone wants me to try something with it to fix it. Regards, Brian -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto