On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Alex J Lennon <ajlen...@dynamicdevices.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been looking into a request to have Yocto kernel configuration > fragment support in meta-raspberrypi with a defconfig which is pulled > from the kernel source tree for the configured machine. > > My understanding is that Yocto expects the defconfig file to be supplied > in the meta-layer and then configured with SRC_URI += "file://defconfig" > > We'd prefer not to maintain copies of defconfigs, instead using the true > default configuration from the kernel tree and allowing users to add > their own .cfg fragments to the SRC_URI via, say, .bbappends.
Anyone who knows me, knows that I'd say I hate to see defconfigs at all ;) But back on topic, this is something I can change, it is simply that when I first put together the linux-yocto kernel configuration steps, that most defconfigs were actually out of tree, and not within the kernel tree itself. > > It's easy enough to _prepend() a function to copy the appropriate > defconfig from the kernel source to the working directory, but I am > having a problem as do_patch() in kernel-yocto.bbclass seems to require > a defconfig file from the layer itself via use of SRC_URI in find_sccs(). > > Any thoughts? Thanks, Pop an enhancement request into the yocto bugzilla and assign it to me. I can take care of it from there. But just to be clear, this will have to stay out of oe-core for a bit, since it is past feature freeze for 1.8 and even bug fixes are cut off shortly. Cheers, Bruce > > Alex > > -- > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto