On śro, 2014-12-10 at 11:00 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Dec 10, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Koehler, Yannick (HP Networking) > <yannick.koeh...@hp.com> wrote: > > Can Yocto build for example in a > single bitbake call an image for x86, ppc, arm, others? Or is the call > to bitbake limited to a single architecture? And if so, how? > > I see > that lots of *-native package are built, and I guess is that for each > machine/os those would be reused, as such, it appears it would be a > benefit to be able to build multiple package version for different > architecture/distro/machine in a single invocation of bitbake. > > > parallel multi-machine builds have been discussed but not thought of > worth doing. you could however share lot of common packages among > machines sequentially.
Out of curiosity, are parallel builds using the same SSTATE_DIR and DL_DIR, but all other *_DIR variables distinct, considered safe? -- Maciej Borzęcki Senior Software Developer at Open-RnD Sp. z o.o., Poland www.open-rnd.pl mobile: +48 889 117 365, fax: +48 42 657 9079 Niniejsza wiadomość wraz z załącznikami może zawierać chronione prawem lub poufne informacje i została wysłana wyłącznie do wiadomości i użytku osób, do których została zaadresowana. Jeśli wiadomość została otrzymana przypadkowo zabrania się jej kopiowania lub rozsyłania do osób trzecich. W takim przypadku uprasza się o natychmiastowe zniszczenie wiadomości oraz poinformowanie nadawcy o zaistniałej sytuacji za pomocą wiadomości zwrotnej. Dziękujemy. This message, including any attachments hereto, may contain privileged or confidential information and is sent solely for the attention and use of the intended addressee(s). If you are not an intended addressee, you may neither use this message nor copy or deliver it to anyone. In such case, you should immediately destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Thank you. -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
