Hi Martin, > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com] > Sent: November 03, 2014 11:05 AM > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 03:09:43PM +0000, Vuille, Martin (Martin) wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Richard Purdie [mailto:richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org] > > > Sent: November 03, 2014 10:06 AM > > > > > > On Mon, 2014-11-03 at 12:53 +0000, Vuille, Martin (Martin) wrote: > > > > I have a variable “REV_TOOLS” defined in distro/conf/somename.conf > > > > in a custom distro layer from a git repo. > > > > > > > > This variable is assigned to SRCREV in a number of recipes (SRCREV > > > > = > > > > “${REV_TOOLS}”) for packages included in my images and SDKs. > > > > > > Can you describe how the value of REV_TOOLS is set? Is it just > > > assigned some value or done with some code? > > > > > > > REV_TOOLS = "<some git commit hash string>" > > > > > Does clearing the bitbake cache make things rebuild as expected (mv > > > tmp/cache tmp/cache-old) ? > > > > > > > I did a cleansstate on the affected packages and they rebuild as expected. > > Do your packages have SRCPV in PV? > > SRCREV isn't included in sstate signature without SRCPV in PV or this > patch: > > commit a414b17e1d783ad68a2d0f7d5922967449c05797 > Author: Ross Burton <ross.bur...@intel.com> > Date: Mon Sep 29 15:40:14 2014 +0100 > > base.bbclass: add SRCREV to do_fetch() hash > > but even with this patch it doesn't work for recipes with multiple > repositories (you can find an e-mail with more details in oe-core ML).
Thanks! No, the packages do not use SRCPV. I don't think we have any cases of recipes with multiple repos. We will review this and either use SRCPV or apply the patch. MV -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
