Hi Davide,
On Tuesday 15 October 2013 12:02:20 Davide Soldan wrote:
> in my recipe I want to change owner and permission of a file, so I wrote:
>
> do_install() {
> ls -la ${D}/opt/user
> chown -R user ${D}/opt/user
> chgrp -R user ${D}/opt/user
> ls -la ${D}/opt/user
> chmod 754 ${D}/opt/user/user.sh
> ls -la ${D}/opt/user
> }
>
> the output of ls commands is:
>
> drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 Oct 15 11:13 .
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Oct 15 11:13 ..
> -rw-r--r-- 1 *root root* 55753 Aug 2 08:48 user.sh
>
> drwxr-xr-x 8 user user 4096 Oct 15 11:13 .
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Oct 15 11:13 ..
> -rw-r--r-- 1 *user user* 55753 Aug 2 08:48 user.sh
>
> drwxr-xr-x 8 user user 4096 Oct 15 11:13 .
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Oct 15 11:13 ..
> *-rwxr-xr--* 1 user user 55753 Aug 2 08:48 user.sh
>
> So the change of owner and permission works fine in do_install phase.
> Opening the final rootfs tarball, however, the file user.sh has still 754
> permission but root as owner...so do_package doesn't preserve owner change
> done in do_install? Or maybe I'm doing something wrong in changing file
> owner? Any ideas? Thanks to all!
Does your recipe create the specified user via useradd.bbclass?
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
