On 8/27/2013 5:42 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Paul Eggleton
<paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
On Tuesday 27 August 2013 09:32:24 David Nyström wrote:
On Mon 26 Aug 2013 11:27:30 PM CEST, Yang Shi wrote:
Add recipe for 1.0.6 version. And, add status and reload commands into
init script.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang....@windriver.com>
---
...irqbalance-Add-status-and-reload-commands.patch | 55
++++++++++++++++++++ recipes-extended/irqbalance/irqbalance_1.0.6.bb
| 15 +++++
2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
recipes-extended/irqbalance/irqbalance/irqbalance-Add-status-and-reload
-commands.patch create mode 100644
recipes-extended/irqbalance/irqbalance_1.0.6.bb>
diff --git
a/recipes-extended/irqbalance/irqbalance/irqbalance-Add-status-and-reload
-commands.patch
b/recipes-extended/irqbalance/irqbalance/irqbalance-Add-status-and-reload
-commands.patch new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d853d0b
--- /dev/null
+++
b/recipes-extended/irqbalance/irqbalance/irqbalance-Add-status-and-reload
-commands.patch @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+From dc7366896dd5a5bae82be4b11530bc9fdb7cbcdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Yang Shi <yang....@windriver.com>
+Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:02 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH] irqbalance: Add status and reload commands
+
+Add status and reload commands for irqbalanced init script
+
+Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang....@windriver.com>
+---
+ irqbalance.init | 12 +++++++++---
+ 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/irqbalance.init b/irqbalance.init
+index d12d62c..f58bf55 100644
+--- a/irqbalance.init
++++ b/irqbalance.init
+@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
+ #!/bin/sh
+ #
+-# Copyright (c) 2012 Wind River Systems, Inc.
++# Copyright (c) 2013 Wind River Systems, Inc
What is this ?, as far as I understand it, the script + recipe is
proprietary licensed to windriver.
I see the windriver copyright notice was introduced with commit:
43b438f06897a390e16709b3f9e11355f325e2e9
I seem to remember that we agreed that all contents of
meta-virtualization should be MIT.
I'm not a lawyer, but as far as I am aware MIT licensing does not preclude
having a copyright owner; in fact the standard form of the MIT license text
begins with a copyright statement.
Right. Copyright != proprietary. You see copyright on pretty much any type of
licensed file, and I've seen plenty of MIT and GPL copyrighted files.
But otherwise, David is correct .. this should have gone to the
meta-virtualization
list, not the yocto list.
Thanks guys. I will resend the patch to meta-virtulization list.
Yang
Cheers,
Bruce
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
