Zitat von Paul Eggleton <paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com>:
Hi Lothar,
On Tuesday 30 July 2013 18:04:49 lot...@denx.de wrote:
I'm writing a recipe firmware_HEAD.bb. The actions shall be checkout from
git, run "make", copy the result to ${D}/lib/firmware.
DESCRIPTION = "external sdma-firmware blob"
LICENSE = "GPLv2"
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
"file://sdma-gen-image.c;beginline=1;endline=19;md5=8db9f935666ba755af54af9d
8611b857" PR = "r1"
SRC_URI = "git://git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/sdma-firmware.git/"
## curr HEAD: "4aede1eb121e8199d33fe6697f4c91405086000a"
SRCREV = "4aede1eb121e8199d33fe6697f4c91405086000a"
S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
do_install(){
install -d ${D}/lib/firmware
# TODO
}
Actually an easy task, I thought. Checkout works fine, but the implicit make
fails, having /lib/ld-linux.so.3 already installed under ${sysroot}/lib.
I'm not sure but it definitely sounds like it's looking on the host
rather than
in the proper target sysroot. I'd suggest looking at other recipes that are
makefile based; you should define your own do_compile and supply the
appropriate
options to make (or more appropriately oe_runmake) within it.
$ MACHINE="m53evk" bitbake -b
/work/lothar/acme/meta-acme/recipes-kernel/sdma-firmware/sdma-firmware_HEAD.
bb -f
WARNING: Buildfile specified, dependencies will not be handled. If
this is not what you want, do not use -b / --buildfile.
You should not use -b; if you do, anything you mention in DEPENDS won't be
satisfied when it comes time. Use "bitbake recipename" instead of "bitbake -b
path/to/recipename_version.bb".
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
Hi,
Thank you very much, I'll watch out for other recipes, then.
Especially thank you for the advice to omit the '-b' option.
BR,
L
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
