On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:03:41PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday 17 July 2013 08:56:34 Brian Hutchinson wrote: > > Thanks Paul, I worried about mixing branches since I've never tried that > > before. The only reason I picked Denzil is because I need ti816x support > > and Dylan and Danny don't have machine confs for it in meta-ti. So what > > would be easier, getting the machine support I need in Dylan or back > > porting the net-snmp recipe to Denzil? > > I don't have a feel for the former - if the reason is not already clear you'd > probably want to ask the meta-ti folks why that machine isn't supported in > later branches and how hard it would be to update support. This might be > worth
Just to update everyone on this list - the issue with ti81x has been discussed on meta-ti list multiple times before and Brian already knew the answer to that. > doing if you're starting something new with denzil, since that's two versions > behind current stable. > > Having said that, backporting the net-snmp recipe should be fairly trivial > though. -- Denys _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
