On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 10:01 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 10:21 -0400, r10kindsofpeople wrote: > > I've been working with denzil, but decided to try and upgrade to > > dylan... > > > > > > Downloading and installing poky-dylan-9.0.1.tar.bz2 went fine. > > Finding and downloading meta-crownbay-dylan-9.0.0.tar.bz2 was easy > > enough. > > > > > > But neither of these give me meta-intel. > > > > Actually, what's in the meta-crownbay-dylan tarball is meta-intel, with > just the meta-crownbay BSP included. But it looks like there's a > problem with the naming of the top-level directory in the tarball: > > $ ls meta-crownbay > binary common conf MAINTAINERS meta-crownbay meta-tlk README > > whereas after untarring, I should have been able to do: > > $ ls meta-intel > binary common conf MAINTAINERS meta-crownbay meta-tlk README > > Beth or Nitin, can you please fix the tarballs so that the top-level > directory isn't the meta-BSPname but meta-intel (like they are for the > previous releases). > > > > > So the central question is: how do I find and download a released > > package that contains meta-intel that's required by meta-crownbay? A > > If you just rename the top-level directory to meta-intel rather than > meta-crownbay, things should be fine.. >
Filed bug 4868 for this. https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4868 Tom > > second question is whether I'd have had problems anyway, given that > > dylan is 9.0.1 and the BSP is 9.0.0. > > > > No, you shouldn't have problems - a given BSP should be good for the > same major release and all its point releases... > > Thanks, > > Tom > > > > > I can do a git of meta-intel, but that apparently gives me a snapshot > > that doesn't play well with the released poky. I can do a git of > > poky, then a git of meta-intel...I still needed to do a bit of > > tweaking but I could bitbake core-image-minimal. Now I'm having > > problems with adt_install, apparently because the scripts all think my > > release is 1.4+snapshot, which breaks the repository links and the > > opkg install. I seem to have gotten around these, too, but if someone > > has something for me to test using released packages, I'm willing, at > > the moment, to start from scratch. > > > > > > John > > > > _______________________________________________ > > yocto mailing list > > yocto@yoctoproject.org > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
