On Tuesday 14 May 2013 11:34:38 Felix01 Fischer wrote: > > It's not the opposite, it's the same. Poky is composed of > > openembedded-core, > > bitbake, yocto-docs and a few other bits and pieces; so you can either > > use poky here or openembedded-core + bitbake. > > First, thank you for your quick reply :-) > > So I guess, it's fine only to add meta-intel and meta-intel/meta-crownbay > to BBLayers and not openembedded-core and bitbake, too?
No, if you are already using poky, you wouldn't add openembedded-core to bblayers.conf and you would never add bitbake there (bitbake is the build tool, it's not a layer). > If so, why not remove this confusing reference to open-embedded? Most layers declare these dependencies because some users prefer to use separate openembedded-core and bitbake rather than the combined poky, and it is the established convention within the layer documentation to declare the separate dependencies. Perhaps we could be clearer in our documentation that poky can take place of those however. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
