* Paul D. DeRocco <pdero...@ix.netcom.com> [130327 09:09]: > The log file shows that the layer.conf file for that layer is being read, > and there is indeed some recipes for Samba. The bitbake -s option lists > samba as one of the packages. But the logs only show a few of recipes being > processed from this layer, none having to do with Samba. I was under the > impression that adding a layer added the recipes in the layer, and caused > them to be built. Apparently not. What am I missing?
Maybe a dumb question... Have you added samba to the image that you're building? Just adding a layer won't cause the added recipes to be built and deployed. If you have added samba to the image, could you share the image recipe and build logs? Can you build samba manually? (Calling bitbake samba, (though I don't know if that's the correct name, as I haven't check the meta-oe-layer for that)). Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB / eStorm AB _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto