-----Original Message----- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bodke, Kishore K Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 11:08 AM To: Bruce Ashfield; Hart, Darren Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] Poky 1.3_M3 branch does not work with linux-yocto 3.0 kernel ?
>-----Original Message----- >From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- >boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Ashfield >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 10:47 AM >To: Hart, Darren >Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org >Subject: Re: [yocto] Poky 1.3_M3 branch does not work with linux-yocto >3.0 kernel ? > >On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Darren Hart <darren.h...@intel.com> wrote: >> On 08/27/2012 08:18 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>> On 12-08-27 8:14 PM, Saxena, Rahul wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am building a BSP (meta-cedartrail) using 1.3 M3 branch of Poky. >>>> >>>> When I try to boot a image such as core-image-sato, I get kernel >>>> panic and errors such as: >>>> >>>> VFS: Cannot open root device "ram0" or unkown-block(0,0) >>>> >>>> Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the available >>>> >>>> partitions: >>>> >>>> VFS: unable to mount root fs on unknown block(0,0) >>>> >>>> User configuration error - no valid rootfilesystem found >>>> >>>> I do see that the root file system exists in >>>> cedartrail-poky-linux/core-image-sato-1.0-r0/rootfs dir.. >>>> >>>> I did not see this problem when I uses a earlier commit of the Poky >>>> master branch. >>>> >>>> It seems like something broke with 1.3 M3 branch that prevents a >>>> proper build with 3.0 kernel. I do need to build my BSP with 3.0 kernel. >>>> >>>> (I was also told by Laurentiu Serban that 1.3 M3 Full Pass testing >>>> does not include testing with the 3.0 kernel) >>>> >>>> Any suggestions would be most welcome. I do need to build my BSP >>>> with the 3.0 kernel. >>> >>> Hmm. It should work, I booted one not that long ago. Can you force >>> qemux86 to prefer the 3.0 kernel and see if that boots ? That would >>> at least start to isolate the potential problem areas. >> >> However, won't 3.0 be removed for the 1.3 release? Keeping with 3.4 >> and >3.2? > >For 1.3 the 3 kernel sliding window plan was 3.4, 3.2 and 3.0 with >2.6.37 being voted off the island. Or did you mean 1.4 ? Regardless, >anything using 3.0 needs to be updated since it's time is running >short! :) > Cedartrail BSP has PVR Graphics drivers which works only with 3.0 Kernel. Thanks Kishore. I am mainly interested in ensuring 3.0 Kernel works with the next Yocto release (i.e. Yocto 1.3) since the CedarTrail BSP will work only with 3.0 Kernel due to a graphics driver dependency. We will not port the Cedartrail BSP beyond Yocto 1.3. Thanks Rahul >Cheers, > >Bruce > >> >> -- >> Darren >> >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Rahul >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Darren Hart >> Intel Open Source Technology Center >> Yocto Project - Linux Kernel >> _______________________________________________ >> yocto mailing list >> yocto@yoctoproject.org >> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > >-- >"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await >thee at its end" >_______________________________________________ >yocto mailing list >yocto@yoctoproject.org >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
