On Aug 4, 2012, at 11:19 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> Do you think it makes sense to add gcc-4.5.4 back into oe-core, if it turns
> out that gcc-4.7.2 is causing a lot of issues for some targets?
I'm creating a gcc-4.5 recipe locally, modeling it after the current gcc-4.7
recipe folder. I've taken the patches from the gcc-4.5.1 recipe folder from a
previous yocto release, and was wondering for the recent gcc-4.5.4 release,
which of these patches can I drop?
SRC_URI = "git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git;branch=${BRANCH};protocol=git \
file://gcc-4.3.1-ARCH_FLAGS_FOR_TARGET.patch \
file://100-uclibc-conf.patch \
file://gcc-uclibc-locale-ctype_touplow_t.patch \
file://cache-amnesia.patch \
file://gcc-flags-for-build.patch \
file://libstdc++-emit-__cxa_end_cleanup-in-text.patch \
file://arm-bswapsi2.patch \
file://fedora/gcc43-c++-builtin-redecl.patch;striplevel=0 \
file://fedora/gcc43-ia64-libunwind.patch;striplevel=0 \
file://fedora/gcc43-java-nomulti.patch;striplevel=0 \
file://fedora/gcc43-ppc32-retaddr.patch;striplevel=0 \
file://fedora/gcc43-pr32139.patch;striplevel=0 \
file://fedora/gcc43-pr33763.patch;striplevel=0 \
file://fedora/gcc43-rh330771.patch;striplevel=0 \
file://fedora/gcc43-rh341221.patch;striplevel=0 \
file://fedora/gcc43-java-debug-iface-type.patch;striplevel=0 \
file://fedora/gcc43-i386-libgomp.patch;striplevel=0 \
file://fedora/gcc45-no-add-needed.patch;striplevel=0 \
file://103-uclibc-conf-noupstream.patch \
file://200-uclibc-locale.patch \
file://203-uclibc-locale-no__x.patch; \
file://204-uclibc-locale-wchar_fix.patch; \
file://205-uclibc-locale-update.patch; \
file://301-missing-execinfo_h.patch \
file://302-c99-snprintf.patch \
file://303-c99-complex-ugly-hack.patch \
file://304-index_macro.patch \
file://305-libmudflap-susv3-legacy.patch \
file://306-libstdc++-namespace.patch \
file://740-sh-pr24836.patch \
file://800-arm-bigendian.patch \
file://904-flatten-switch-stmt-00.patch \
file://arm-nolibfloat.patch \
file://arm-softfloat.patch \
file://zecke-xgcc-cpp.patch \
file://gcc-poison-system-directories.patch \
file://gcc-poison-dir-extend.patch \
file://gcc-4.3.3-SYSROOT_CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET.patch \
file://64bithack.patch \
file://optional_libstdc.patch \
file://disable_relax_pic_calls_flag.patch \
file://GPLUSPLUS_INCLUDE_DIR_with_sysroot.patch \
file://COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS.patch \
file://use-defaults.h-and-t-oe-in-B.patch \
file://pr43810.patch \
file://pr44290.patch \
file://pr44606.patch \
file://pr45094.patch \
file://pr45052.patch \
file://pr45886.patch \
file://pr44618.patch \
"
SRC_URI_append_sh3 = " file://sh3-installfix-fixheaders.patch "
I notice that around 60 to 70% of the above patches are still applied to the
gcc-4.7 recipe, so I was wondering how one maintains this recipe.
Best regards,
Elvis Dowson
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
