On Tuesday 12 June 2012 05:30:34 Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2012-06-12 05:26, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > FWIW, we will be looking at fixing this exact workflow pretty soon > > although it may involve an extra explicit step to invalidate the stamps. > > IMO, if you run a specific step like "-c compile -f", this should > automatically invalidate any stamps and sstate info for the package that > depend on that step. In this case, it should invalidate "install, package, > ..." - everything that normally happens after "compile". This would fix > the observed weirdness above.
FYI I'm going to track/fix this under bug 2256 since that is pretty much the same thing. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
