On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 10:45 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > > On 05/31/2012 08:37 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On 12-05-31 2:27 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 05/25/2012 03:38 PM, Michael Halstead wrote: > >>> The first draft of the reorganized bugzilla is available for feedback > >>> now at https://bugzilla.yoctodev.org/. Outgoing e-mail is currently > >>> disabled on this preview copy. Please feel free to take a look and see > >>> if you spot any errors. Additional refinement of product or component > >>> descriptions will be helpful as well. > >>> > >> > >> It seems to me one should be able to find the linux-yocto kernel itself > >> under the Yocto Project Components from the basic search page. Currently > >> there is Kernel Tooling and BSPs, but there are times when the bug is > >> not BSP specific and is in the kernel itself, not the tooling. For this, > >> a hierarchy like the following might be preferable: > >> > >> Yocto Project Components > >> BSPs > >> bsps > >> Kernel > >> linux-yocto > >> configuration > >> kernel-tooling > > > > +1. I completely agree with this. > > > >> > >> I am still not sure how best to deal with BSPs here and BSPs in Build > >> System& Metadata. I think We should pick one or the other as the > >> distinction between the two is non-obvious (actually I have no idea what > >> it would be). > > > > Agreed .. that this is hard. If we used 'configuration' for the kernel > > category, could the build system + meta data fall into that as well > > under BSPs ? > > > > i.e. > > > > BSPs > > bsps - runtime > > bsps - configuration > > I think so. I like this better. > > Tom, any objections? >
No objections, this all looks fine to me. > Yocto Project Components > BSPs > bsps-runtime > bsps-configuration > Kernel > linux-yocto > kernel-configuration > kernel-tooling > > The other Kernel related path would include > Build System & Metadata > Layers - OpenEmbedded-Core > kernel > > This would be for the kernel.bbclass and other recipes and classes. > It would be nice to have that fact reflected in the name somehow, to avoid confusion for users with Yocto Project Components->Kernel, but I'm not coming up with anything wieldy. > I think we should just kill: > Build System & Metadata > Layers - BSPs > > and move all the BSP components under Yocto Project Components->BSPs > I agree, it would just add confusion to keep this. > Finally there is: > > Build System & Metadata > Layers - meta-yocto > machines > > Which should just go away and be replaced witha BSPs->meta-yocto > component, if anything. > Better known as 'core BSPs', which might be more clear to some... > So, the final layout would be: > > Yocto Project Components > BSPs > bsps-runtime > bsps-configuration (these top too being "generic" buckets) > bsps-meta-yocto On the other hand this naming is clean and consistent with the rest, so is probably better. > bsps-meta-fsl-ppc > bsps-meta-intel > bsps-meta-ti > bsps-tools > bsps-xilinx (meta-xilinx?) > > Kernel > linux-yocto > kernel-configuration > kernel-tooling > > I believe this would make it much easier for us to manage Kernel related > issues across the project. > I agree. Acked-by-me... Tom > -- > Darren > > > > > > ? > > > > Bruce > > > >> > >> Tom, Bruce: opinions on the above? > >> > >> > >> "Build System& Metadata" and "Yocto Metadata Layers" use different > >> naming schemes for the components in the various layers products. Some > >> use meta- others do not. > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
