On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 10:35 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 4/16/12 8:01 PM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am testing beagleboard with RPM, and there is a question I am confused > > with that PACKAGE_ARCH is renamed for certain packages. For example the > > "acl" package, whose expected PACKAGE_ARCH is "armv7a-vfp-neon", however > > in RPM file, the arch is renamed to "armv7a", see > > "acl-2.2.51-r2.armv7a.rpm". However IPK package still shows > > "acl_2.2.51-r2_armv7a-vfp-neon.ipk". > > > > Could anybody give hint on this? > > > > Thanks, > > Dongxiao > > > > I've not seen that happen before. Can you checked if an > acl-...armv7a-vfp-neon.rpm was generated and RPM is simply not using it, or > was > it never generated?
No, there is no acl-xxx.armv7a-vfp-neon.rpm, only acl-xxx.armv7a.rpm created. Actually I think this issue does exist since our 1.1 release, you can have a look at the package repo: http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-1.1/rpm/armv7a-vfp-neon/ The directory is named as "armv7a-vfp-neon", however all the packages under the directory are of "armv7a" architecture. While see the ipk part: http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-1.1/ipk/armv7a-vfp-neon/ The directory name and rpm architecture name are the same. Thanks, Dongxiao > > As another user mentioned, it is possible for a package to say it wants a > specific arch type, but if it did -- it should be consistent between > packaging > systems. > > --Mark _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
