On 01/05/2012 06:44 AM, Jack Mitchell wrote:
Good morning everyone,
I am currently trying to figure out the best way to integrate the
meta-texasinstruments layer with the Yocto provided layers. According to
the meta-texasinstruments readme, it requires the meta-oe, meta-angstrom
and meta-oe-core. Now Yocto provides the stable meta-oe-core (correct?),
so I would clone the meta-oe and meta-angstrom, add them and the
meta-texasinstruments layer to my bblayers.conf then build away, yes?
However, what implications does adding these new layers bring when using
them in the Yocto environment?
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated on the consequences and/or my
methodology!
The main aim of the game is trying to build an image for the beagleboard
using the meta-texasinstruments layer as to get the latest and greatest
support - with the possibility of using it later in the day when the
beaglebones start appearing but with the stability and additional
support that is acquired through the Yocto umbrella.
Yes, all good goals and within the scope of the plans for meta-ti (aka
meta-texasinstruments). However meta-ti is still a work in progress.
By the yocto 1.2 release time frame we plan to support and show the
following layer combinations:
core stack: oe-core + meta-ti
yocto stack: poky layer set + meta-ti
angstrom stack: oe-core + meta-oe + meta-ti + meta-angstrom
arago stack: oe-core + meta-oe + meta-ti + meta-arago
However at this time the only stack being built is the angstrom
configuration.
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
