On 11-12-21 11:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/21/2011 07:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-21 10:52 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 12/21/2011 06:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-12-21 04:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
linux-yocto-tiny drops the linux-tools and sets the KMACHINE
branch to standard/tiny.
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart<dvh...@linux.intel.com>
---
...
+SRC_URI =
"git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-3.0;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta
\
+ file://core.cfg \
+ file://serial.cfg \
+ file://ext2.cfg \
+ file://rtc-pc.cfg \
+ file://ramfs.cfg \
+ file://devtmpfs.cfg \
+ file://net.cfg \
+ file://debug.cfg \
+ file://lzma.cfg \
+ "
So I assume that the order of these doesn't really matter, and that
they are non-overlapping ? The answer must be yes, since you've been
testing this, and you don't have a .scc file to control their order :)
That's correct.
Other than that, it looks pretty good to me.
Great. Did you have a close look at core.cfg? It along with things like
devtmpfs and ramfs are likely to form the basis of the linux-yocto tiny
ktype general policy.
I had a 'medium' depth look :) I didn't see anything outrageous
or shocking. I'll loop back and have a better look later as well.
I'm mostly interested in things that are MISSING.
Aha. That's different. I'll go back and look!
Bruce
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
