On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:29 PM, <yocto-requ...@yoctoproject.org> wrote:
> Send yocto mailing list submissions to > yocto@yoctoproject.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > yocto-requ...@yoctoproject.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > yocto-ow...@yoctoproject.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of yocto digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: any objection to adding a PREMIRRORS section to the QS > guide? (Robert P. J. Day) > 2. Re: root paths in packages (McClintock Matthew-B29882) > 3. Re: [PATCH 1/2] meta-romley: Fix BSP description in > romley.conf (Bodke, Kishore K) > 4. Re: [PATCH 2/2] meta-romley: change references to sugarbay in > linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend (Bodke, Kishore K) > 5. Re: root paths in packages (Mark Hatle) > 6. Re: what's the proper value for BB_NUMBER_THREADS? (Mark Hatle) > 7. Re: what's the proper value for BB_NUMBER_THREADS? > (Robert P. J. Day) > 8. Re: what's the proper value for BB_NUMBER_THREADS? (Gary Thomas) > 9. Re: root paths in packages (McClintock Matthew-B29882) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:01:26 -0400 (EDT) > From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> > To: "Rifenbark, Scott M" <scott.m.rifenb...@intel.com> > Cc: Yocto discussion list <yocto@yoctoproject.org> > Subject: Re: [yocto] any objection to adding a PREMIRRORS section to > the QS guide? > Message-ID: > <alpine.DEB.2.02.1110311150440.7448@localhost6.localdomain6> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: > > > Robert, > > > > We do have a question addressed in the Yocto Project Reference > > Manual that talks about premirrors and how Poky finds stuff. See > > the H.24 section of the manual > > > http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/poky-ref-manual/poky-ref-manual.html > . > > Maybe this information is a bit too buried to be useful. I could > > specifically reference that FAQ entry from within the QS in the same > > area that I mention the other "useful" items to consider in the > > local.conf file, such as BB_NUMBER_THREADS, etc. > > > > Scott > > i know about the PREMIRRORS stuff in the poky reference manual -- i > was just toying with the idea that knowing how PREMIRRORS works would > be useful, even for a beginner. > > perhaps i'm not using it properly, but in my case, it's handy since > i have a downloads directory of nothing but tarballs that i've been > accumulating over the last while that i've used for openembedded and > other projects. i'm using PREMIRRORS_prepend to take advantage of all > that content to avoid any unnecessary downloading. and every time i > *do* end up downloading a newer version of a tarball that i didn't > have, i copy it to that central downloads directory for the next time. > does that make sense? and, as i said, even beginners should be able > to appreciate taking advantage of local content they may have > collected for other reasons. > > in any event, i have some different ideas for the design of a > beginner's guide i plan on using in some of my own presentations, so i > don't have to inflict all of my ideas on everyone else. > > rday > > -- > > ======================================================================== > Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA > http://crashcourse.ca > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday > LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday > ======================================================================== > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:32:23 +0000 > From: McClintock Matthew-B29882 <b29...@freescale.com> > To: Mike Tsukerman <miketsuker...@gmail.com> > Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org> > Subject: Re: [yocto] root paths in packages > Message-ID: > <CAEsOVNd18cWS5JeaxHMLTR9-pr+65bb4s=qc7h_6prq1ppt...@mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Mike Tsukerman <miketsuker...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hello, > > I've build rpm packages and met some interesting things. > > In the rpm all scripts and files include root paths from machine that > i've > > build on. > > how can i change that? > > Which package? Can you give some examples? > > -M > > - Hide quoted text - On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:26 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 < b29...@freescale.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Mike Tsukerman > <miketsuker...@gmail.com> wrote: > What commands did you run to generate this rpm? What file is this in? > Usually the shebang should be updated to remove any references to > build environment but it looks like it's still referencing perl-native > from the build environment. > > Is this script used on the target machine or just during the build > process? It might not be explicitly required. > > I've run MACHINE=beagleboard bitbake world. Then i get a lot of rpms in armv7a-vfp-neon folder. I have an igep0020 board, and core-image-minimal-dev running on it. I use these rpm's on the board. And as expected dpkg is not working before i found that it includes these paths. But all other rpm's have the same problems - in INSTALL and UPGRADE scripts i've found root paths. rpm --nosignature -ivh /media/mdev/yocto/poky/build/tmp/deploy/rpm/armv7a-vfp-neon/zip-dev-3.0-r0.armv7a.rpm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:01:06 -0700 > From: "Bodke, Kishore K" <kishore.k.bo...@intel.com> > To: "Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanu...@intel.com>, "yocto@yoctoproject.org" > <yocto@yoctoproject.org> > Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/2] meta-romley: Fix BSP description in > romley.conf > Message-ID: > < > 4bd43a85686fc34d819098db1c3999d9018f709...@orsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Acked-by: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bo...@intel.com> > > Thanks > Kishore. > > -----Original Message----- > From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto: > yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of tom.zanu...@intel.com > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 7:00 AM > To: yocto@yoctoproject.org > Subject: [yocto] [PATCH 1/2] meta-romley: Fix BSP description in > romley.conf > > From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> > > The description still had a reference to Sugar Bay; this changes it to > Romley. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> > --- > meta-romley/conf/machine/romley.conf | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta-romley/conf/machine/romley.conf > b/meta-romley/conf/machine/romley.conf > index 38bd17a..2dcb5db 100644 > --- a/meta-romley/conf/machine/romley.conf > +++ b/meta-romley/conf/machine/romley.conf > @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ > #@TYPE: Machine > #@NAME: romley > > -#@DESCRIPTION: Machine configuration for Sugar Bay systems > +#@DESCRIPTION: Machine configuration for Romley systems > # i.e. Sandy Bridge + Patsburg Chipset > > require conf/machine/include/tune-x86_64.inc > -- > 1.7.0.4 > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:03:47 -0700 > From: "Bodke, Kishore K" <kishore.k.bo...@intel.com> > To: "Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanu...@intel.com>, "yocto@yoctoproject.org" > <yocto@yoctoproject.org> > Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/2] meta-romley: change references to > sugarbay in linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend > Message-ID: > < > 4bd43a85686fc34d819098db1c3999d9018f709...@orsmsx502.amr.corp.intel.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Acked-by: Kishore Bodke <kishore.k.bo...@intel.com> > > Thanks > Kishore. > > -----Original Message----- > From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto: > yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of tom.zanu...@intel.com > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 7:00 AM > To: yocto@yoctoproject.org > Subject: [yocto] [PATCH 2/2] meta-romley: change references to sugarbay in > linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend > > From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> > > There are still references to sugarbay in linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend; > this changes them to romley. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> > --- > .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend | 6 +++--- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta-romley/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend > b/meta-romley/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend > index d630dc4..1551ccf 100644 > --- a/meta-romley/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend > +++ b/meta-romley/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.0.bbappend > @@ -3,6 +3,6 @@ COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_romley = "romley" > KMACHINE_romley = "romley" > > # Update the following to use a different BSP branch or meta SRCREV > -#KBRANCH_sugarbay = "yocto/standard/preempt-rt/base" > -#SRCREV_machine_pn-linux-yocto-rt_sugarbay ?= XXXX > -#SRCREV_meta_pn-linux-yocto-rt_sugarbay ?= XXXX > +#KBRANCH_romley = "yocto/standard/preempt-rt/base" > +#SRCREV_machine_pn-linux-yocto-rt_romley ?= XXXX > +#SRCREV_meta_pn-linux-yocto-rt_romley ?= XXXX > -- > 1.7.0.4 > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:12:08 -0500 > From: Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> > To: <yocto@yoctoproject.org> > Subject: Re: [yocto] root paths in packages > Message-ID: <4eaed6e8.3080...@windriver.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" > > On 10/31/11 5:57 AM, Mike Tsukerman wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've build rpm packages and met some interesting things. > > In the rpm all scripts and files include root paths from machine that > i've build on. > > how can i change that? > > Examples of the problem are definitely needed. There are some cases where > embedded paths simply refer to the place on the disk a source file or > similar > came from during the build. Depending on where these references are, they > may > be considered safe and acceptable. However, in most places something like > this > would be considered an error. > > --Mark > > > -- > > Best regards, Mike Tsukerman > > > > jabber: miketsuker...@gmail.com <mailto:miketsuker...@gmail.com> > > jabber: war...@jabnet.org <mailto:war...@jabnet.org> > > skype: w_a_r_z_o_n > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > yocto mailing list > > yocto@yoctoproject.org > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 12:15:28 -0500 > From: Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> > To: <yocto@yoctoproject.org> > Subject: Re: [yocto] what's the proper value for BB_NUMBER_THREADS? > Message-ID: <4eaed7b0.4050...@windriver.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" > > On 10/30/11 11:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > > >> On 30/10/11 15:32, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >>> > >>> all the docs recommend twice the number of cores (AFAICT), yet the > >>> template local.conf file suggests that, for a quad core, the value of > >>> 4 would be appropriate. shouldn't that say 8? same with > >>> PARALLEL_MAKE? > >> > >> Hi Robert, > >> > >> The Poky ref manual says (rule of thumb) x2 for BB_NUMBER_THREADS, > >> and x1.5 for PARALLEL_MAKE. > > > > if that's the case, anyone object to my submitting a patch to > > update local.conf.sample appropriately? > > > > rday > > > > I agree the manual and local.conf files should match. The issue seems to > be > that the perfect values are subjective. Things like memory, disk speed, > chipset > latency, and of course processor speed/cores all affect the optimal > setting. > But we do need a consistent rule of thumb.. I myself usually use x2 for > both > THREADS and MAKE. > > --Mark > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:25:03 -0400 (EDT) > From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> > To: Mark Hatle <mark.ha...@windriver.com> > Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [yocto] what's the proper value for BB_NUMBER_THREADS? > Message-ID: > <alpine.DEB.2.02.1110311323050.8545@localhost6.localdomain6> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Mark Hatle wrote: > > > On 10/30/11 11:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > > > > > >> On 30/10/11 15:32, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > >>> > > >>> all the docs recommend twice the number of cores (AFAICT), yet the > > >>> template local.conf file suggests that, for a quad core, the value of > > >>> 4 would be appropriate. shouldn't that say 8? same with > > >>> PARALLEL_MAKE? > > >> > > >> Hi Robert, > > >> > > >> The Poky ref manual says (rule of thumb) x2 for BB_NUMBER_THREADS, > > >> and x1.5 for PARALLEL_MAKE. > > > > > > if that's the case, anyone object to my submitting a patch to > > > update local.conf.sample appropriately? > > > > > > rday > > > > > > > I agree the manual and local.conf files should match. The issue > > seems to be that the perfect values are subjective. Things like > > memory, disk speed, chipset latency, and of course processor > > speed/cores all affect the optimal setting. But we do need a > > consistent rule of thumb.. I myself usually use x2 for both THREADS > > and MAKE. > > that's what i would normally use, assuming that having an overly > high value for either of those settings can't possibly hurt. if > that's the consensus, i can adjust the references to say 2x everywhere > that i know of. just let me know. > > rday > > -- > > ======================================================================== > Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA > http://crashcourse.ca > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday > LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday > ======================================================================== > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:39:06 -0600 > From: Gary Thomas <g...@mlbassoc.com> > To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpj...@crashcourse.ca> > Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org > Subject: Re: [yocto] what's the proper value for BB_NUMBER_THREADS? > Message-ID: <4eaedd3a.9070...@mlbassoc.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > On 2011-10-31 11:25, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Mark Hatle wrote: > > > >> On 10/30/11 11:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 30/10/11 15:32, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> all the docs recommend twice the number of cores (AFAICT), yet > the > >>>>> template local.conf file suggests that, for a quad core, the value of > >>>>> 4 would be appropriate. shouldn't that say 8? same with > >>>>> PARALLEL_MAKE? > >>>> > >>>> Hi Robert, > >>>> > >>>> The Poky ref manual says (rule of thumb) x2 for BB_NUMBER_THREADS, > >>>> and x1.5 for PARALLEL_MAKE. > >>> > >>> if that's the case, anyone object to my submitting a patch to > >>> update local.conf.sample appropriately? > >>> > >>> rday > >>> > >> > >> I agree the manual and local.conf files should match. The issue > >> seems to be that the perfect values are subjective. Things like > >> memory, disk speed, chipset latency, and of course processor > >> speed/cores all affect the optimal setting. But we do need a > >> consistent rule of thumb.. I myself usually use x2 for both THREADS > >> and MAKE. > > > > that's what i would normally use, assuming that having an overly > > high value for either of those settings can't possibly hurt. if > > that's the consensus, i can adjust the references to say 2x everywhere > > that i know of. just let me know. > > Look back in the archives - I think it was Richard that did a fairly > extensive study of this and he (whoever it was) found that there were > saturation points and trying to get beyond them had a negative impact. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:27:27 +0000 > From: McClintock Matthew-B29882 <b29...@freescale.com> > To: Mike Tsukerman <miketsuker...@gmail.com> > Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org> > Subject: Re: [yocto] root paths in packages > Message-ID: > <CAEsOVNeP_tPvsB0BEX2tLXK=sEHP1=nssepex4gvwmiawr2...@mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Mike Tsukerman > <miketsuker...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'am using upstream release from git repository. > > my building path is /media/mdev/yocto/poky/build/. > > For example dpkg rpm package for armv7 neon. But it's the same for ?all > > other packages. This cause many many errors and faults. > > i've attached to the letter screenshot with example. > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 8:32 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 > > <b29...@freescale.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Mike Tsukerman < > miketsuker...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > I've build rpm packages and met some interesting things. > >> > In the rpm all scripts and files include root paths from machine that > >> > i've > >> > build on. > >> > how can i change that? > > Mike, > > You need to reply all to include the mailing list. > > What commands did you run to generate this rpm? What file is this in? > Usually the shebang should be updated to remove any references to > build environment but it looks like it's still referencing perl-native > from the build environment. > > Is this script used on the target machine or just during the build > process? It might not be explicitly required. > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: example.png > Type: image/png > Size: 162063 bytes > Desc: example.png > URL: < > http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20111031/af29d2b9/attachment.png > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > yocto mailing list > yocto@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > End of yocto Digest, Vol 13, Issue 54 > ************************************* > -- Best regards, Mike Tsukerman jabber: miketsuker...@gmail.com jabber: war...@jabnet.org skype: w_a_r_z_o_n
_______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
