On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 10:45 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:57 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 06:17 -0700, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 14:27 -0500, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: > > > > From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> > > > > > > > > oe-core commit dc3a8274c7e935fa564eea142d2535c9bcf2b272 for YOCTO #1428 > > > > broke meta-intel x86_64 builds: > > > > > > > > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies > > > > ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'initramfs-live-install' (but > > > > /usr/local/src/yocto/sugarbay/meta/recipes-core/images/core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb > > > > RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it) > > > > ERROR: initramfs-live-install was skipped: incompatible with host > > > > x86_64-poky-linux > > > > > > > > This patchset restores the build. > > > > > > > > Build and install-tested on sugarbay and crownbay. > > > > > > > > More fixes for [YOCTO #1428] > > > > > > > > The following changes since commit > > > > b86f811663d834064af1e6778c408eb904fad0b9: > > > > Darren Hart (1): > > > > n450: update linux-yocto PREFERRED_VERSION to 3.0% > > > > > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > > > > > git://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-intel.git tzanussi/1428-fix > > > > > > > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel/log/?h=tzanussi/1428-fix > > > > > > > > Tom Zanussi (2): > > > > meta-intel/common: create a grub2 version initramfs-live-install > > > > meta-intel/common: remove initramfs-live-install 1.0 bbappend > > > > > > Is there a disadvantage to moving to grub2 in OE-Core and then bringing > > > these pieces into sync? > > > > > > > Yes, it would make sense - the plan was to do that during the 1.2 > > cycle... > > If someone can confirm that 32 and 64 bit live images work with grub2 > and there is no good reason not to do this, I'd be in favour of doing > this now rather than explain why its a mess... >
I haven't tried the 32-bit BSPs with grub2 - been focused on other things until this incomplete fix for 1428 seems to have forced the issue, but can try it over the weekend and see what happens. grub2 isn't a simple version bump from the legacy grub 0.97, but is a completely incompatible re-write - I thought being more cautious in removing the grub 0.97 that's worked fine for everything but the couple of 64-bit meta-intel BSPs that need it would be something for 1.2, but if it can go in now, why not... Tom > Cheers, > > Richard > _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
