Hi Darren, With the below Tom's commit IDs, the build was success and I am moving ahead with this. I am not blocked. I was also able to build and boot the Crystalforest BSP.
Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:42 AM To: Bodke, Kishore K Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay On 09/01/2011 03:05 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: > For the build I removed the rttests in the IMAGE_INSTALL , so it is not > showing up here. > > bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "IMAGE_INSTALL=" > > # MULTILIB_IMAGE_INSTALL= > # IMAGE_INSTALL=${POKY_BASE_INSTALL} > IMAGE_INSTALL="task-core-boot task-base-extended" > > I will rebuild with rttests and send the output. Hi Kishore, Where are you with this? Are you unblocked and moving ahead? Thanks, Darren > > Thanks > Kishore. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:52 PM > To: Bodke, Kishore K > Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul > Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay > > Can you report the output of: > > $ bitbake -e core-image-sato | egrep "^IMAGE_INSTALL=" > > Thanks, > > Darren > > On 09/01/2011 02:14 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >> Yeah, it is the same do_rootfs failure I get for both the builds. >> Thanks >> Kishore. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] >> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 2:08 PM >> To: Bodke, Kishore K >> Cc: Zanussi, Tom; yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul >> Subject: Re: RT kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay >> >> On 09/01/2011 02:01 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >>> Clean build with the below TOM's two commit IDs worked for me, if I >>> do not add IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" for sugarbay. >>> >>> It failed if I add the IMAGE_INSTALL += "rttests" >> >> Do you get the same error? If so, it's starting to sound like the second >> build is what fails since neither of your failure scenarios include >> a change that's related to the failure. Perhaps an issue with sstate... >> >> -- >> Darren >> >>> >>> Thanks Kishore. -----Original Message----- From: Darren Hart >>> [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 >>> 1:57 PM To: Zanussi, Tom Cc: Bodke, Kishore K; >>> yocto@yoctoproject.org; Hart, Darren; Saxena, Rahul Subject: Re: RT >>> kernel with core-image-sato build failed for sugarbay >>> >>> >>> >>> On 08/31/2011 09:19 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 16:49 -0700, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am trying to build core-image-sato with rt kernel for sugarbay >>>>> and it fails for the do_rootfs . >>>>> >>>> >>>> FWIW, I was able to build and boot core-image-sato with the rt >>>> kernel: >>>> >>>> Linux sugarbay 3.0.3-rt8-yocto-preempt-rt+ #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Wed >>>> Aug 31 21:33:27 CDT 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>>> >>>> using the following commits: >>>> >>>> poky/master 705ec50edda7f7fb8c132238fe3f1477384a470e meta/intel >>>> 902d2f3c919cd1d870dc8d35a7521cbba42e53ea >>>> >>>> Actually, meta/intel was that commit with Darren's grub patch on >>>> top (meta-intel/dvhart/grub-freetype). >>>> >>> >>> Kishore, would you try with a clean build and see if this works for >>> you? >>> >>> I'm going to try and build first without -rt and then with rt and see >>> if I can reproduce the issue. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Darren >>> >>>> Tom >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Attached is the build log. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Could you please let me know what went wrong? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Kishore. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
