Seeing this change reminded me that we really should move grub_1.98 to oe-core, is there any objection to this? Any reason this should not be part of oe-core to support general x86_64 machines?
Sau! On 08/31/2011 07:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Grub's configure task was picking up the host freetype libraries if bitbake hadn't gotten around building freetype yet. We could add a dependency on freetype, but it's only used for the optional grub-mkfont utility which we don't really need. Disable grub-mkfont via EXTRA_OECONF, removing the dependency on freetype. Testing: core-image-minimal build and install on sugarbay. Signed-off-by: Darren Hart<dvh...@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Tom Zanussi<tom.zanu...@intel.com> --- common/recipes-bsp/grub/grub_1.98.bb | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/common/recipes-bsp/grub/grub_1.98.bb b/common/recipes-bsp/grub/grub_1.98.bb index 0cd3a40..802733f 100644 --- a/common/recipes-bsp/grub/grub_1.98.bb +++ b/common/recipes-bsp/grub/grub_1.98.bb @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ SRC_URI = "ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/grub/grub-${PV}.tar.gz \ inherit autotools inherit gettext -EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-platform=pc --target=i386" +EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-platform=pc --target=i386 --disable-grub-mkfont" do_configure() { oe_runconf
_______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
