On 08/17/2011 09:51 AM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com>
>
> The emgd-driver-bin recipe now automatically downloads and installs
> EMGD using the new click-through-free tarball, but since the binaries
> still fall under a non-free license, we need to prevent it from being
> accidentally installed in an image.
>
> We therefore make sure it's labeled in the fri2 layer with
> 'COMMERCIAL_LICENSE'. In order to build an fri2 image, the user
> now needs to add a 'COMMERCIAL_LICENSE = ""' line to local.conf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com>
> ---
> meta-fri2/conf/layer.conf | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta-fri2/conf/layer.conf b/meta-fri2/conf/layer.conf
> index 261cccc..eb17336 100644
> --- a/meta-fri2/conf/layer.conf
> +++ b/meta-fri2/conf/layer.conf
> @@ -10,3 +10,5 @@ BBFILES := "${BBFILES} ${LAYERDIR}/recipes-*/*/*.bb \
> BBFILE_COLLECTIONS += "fri2"
> BBFILE_PATTERN_fri2 := "^${LAYERDIR}/"
> BBFILE_PRIORITY_fri2 = "6"
> +
> +COMMERCIAL_LICENSE += "emgd-driver-bin"
Can't this be done in the common emgd driver recipe? Seems wrong to have
to specify commercial license for recipe in a machine config... A
different machine could just omit it and the user would not have to add
COMMERCIAL_LICENSE = "" to their local.conf and it would be fine?
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
