On 07/14/2011 05:55 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: > From: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> > > The meta-intel BSPs currently have a number of machine settings common > to all - factor these out into a couple common include files. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> > --- > common/common-bsp-mach.inc | 13 +++++++++++++ > common/common-bsp-x.inc | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 common/common-bsp-mach.inc > create mode 100644 common/common-bsp-x.inc > > diff --git a/common/common-bsp-mach.inc b/common/common-bsp-mach.inc > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..b020a84 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/common/common-bsp-mach.inc > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ > +MACHINE_FEATURES = "kernel26 screen keyboard pci usbhost ext2 ext3 x86 \ > + acpi serial usbgadget" > + > +KERNEL_IMAGETYPE = "bzImage" > + > +SERIAL_CONSOLE = "115200 ttyS0" > + > +MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS = "kernel-modules eee-acpi-scripts" > +
If these are going in common .inc files we need them to be easily overridden, shouldn't all the above be using the ?= operator? -- Darren > +IMAGE_FSTYPES ?= "ext3 cpio.gz" > + > +GLIBC_ADDONS = "nptl" > +GLIBC_EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-tls" > diff --git a/common/common-bsp-x.inc b/common/common-bsp-x.inc > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..c012efd > --- /dev/null > +++ b/common/common-bsp-x.inc > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libx11 ?= "libx11-trim" > +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libgl ?= "mesa-dri" > +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/xserver ?= "xserver-xf86-dri-lite" > +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/xserver-xf86 ?= "xserver-xf86-dri-lite" -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
