Op 18 jun 2011, om 17:10 heeft Koen Kooi het volgende geschreven: > > Op 18 jun 2011, om 17:08 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: > >> >> >> On 06/18/2011 01:11 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: >>> >>> Op 18 jun 2011, om 01:18 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: >>> >>>> From: Darren Hart <dvh...@linux.intel.com> >>>> >>>> The following commits have been pulled in from the meta-ti >>>> linux-omap_2.6.37 recipe, with the exception of: USB: ehci: remove >>>> structure packing from ehci_def which hails from mainline and >>>> should be applied to yocto/base, while the rest should be applied >>>> to yocto/standard/beagleboard. >>>> >>>> Fixes [YOCTO #764] Fixes [YOCTO #765] Fixes [YOCTO #767] >>>> >>>> This brings linux-yocto in sync with the meta-ti linux-omap_2.6.37 >>>> recipe and significantly improves Beagleboard support in >>>> linux-yocto. As there are 115 patches in total, and none of them >>>> are new, I have omitted them from the email. >>> >>> >>> You seem to be including the patches that patch the kernel from >>> 37rc7 (or rc8, I forget) to .37 final, which shouldn't apply. So >>> basically leave out the patches in the 'linus' directory. >> >> There were about 200 patches in total, I've removed all those that >> reverse applied and failed do to a conflict that was obviously a merge >> of a very similar patch. That accounted for most of the 37-rc[78] to 37 >> patches from the linus directory. >> >>> The camera >>> interface also doesn't work, so the 'media' directory can be left out >>> as well. >> >> The goal was to stay as close to the meta-ti/linux-omap_2.6.37 recipe as >> possible with the linux-yocto kernel repository. Will you be removing >> all of the media directory from there as well? I don't want to remove >> them from here if you'll be *adding* to them there. However, if you'll >> be sure to just be replacing them there, then I can drop them here. > > The .37 isn't used, developed or supported for beagleboard anymore, .39 is > all the rage now :)
Speaking of .39, is there a 'linux-yocto' type of tree for .39 mainline with a skeleton for machine support? If there is, I'd like to fork it to see if it can improve my current workflow which consist of self written scripts that emulate guilt. _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto