On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Darren Hart <dvh...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 02/01/2011 09:25 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> Fixes [BUGID #692] >> >> Previously the information dumped by the kernel configuration audit >> scripts was only placed in log files. This isn't as useful as it >> could be, since they are rarely checked. This change takes the >> output from kconf_check and explicitly displays it to the user. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield<bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> > >> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc >> b/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc >> index 0c3aa9a..ac0de6a 100644 >> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc >> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/poky-default-revisions.inc > >> -SRCREV_meta_pn-linux-yocto ?= "8a49ef6f1a43dabbce34a9ee9a1be08b26fc511c" >> +SRCREV_meta_pn-linux-yocto ?= "e8b8c1ae44932835f4f79e77180d3ce5e4b1ec99" > > Was this an intentional change? It wasn't clear to me above which bits > necessitated a linux-yocto-2.6.37/meta SRCREV change.
Good catch, and typically that would have been a mistake. That's me updating the captured scripts to have the updated kconf_check (among others), so it was intentional, but I did for get to mention it in the submission email. Cheers, Bruce > > -- > Darren Hart > Intel Open Source Technology Center > Yocto Project - Linux Kernel > _______________________________________________ > poky mailing list > p...@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky > -- "Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await thee at its end" _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
