> I tend to feel that this approach is more flexible, and scales better > > than having to support each and every qemu option with our own script > > syntax. Is this acceptable, or should we continue to support our own > > custom options in addition to Criping's new approach? > > My gut feeling is that having some simplified way to trigger possibly > complex option combinations is still desirable but adding a way to pass > additional custom commandline is equally good. This gives us the > maximum > flexibility moving forwards but keeps the script easy to use? >
Hi, Scott So the conclusion is that I should keep the old (serial nographic) option while adding the new "<-XXX -XXX -XXX>" option? OK. I will send out the modified patch to you for review later. Thanks& Regards, criping > Cheers, > > Richard _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
