On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 06:35, Khem Raj via lists.yoctoproject.org <raj.khem=gmail....@lists.yoctoproject.org> wrote: > It is possible, but success and effort will vary depending upon how > complex the package is and how hairy the dependencies > are. you will have to see if you need to adjust for yocto syntax > changes, new tools, new host tools, new target dependencies etc. so it > can be quite a lot or in best > cases it will be sticking a backport and it compiling without any other > changes.
I'd say the greater chance of success would be moving your setup from kirkstone to scarthgap. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#64723): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/64723 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/111027204/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-