Hi,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:42:51PM +0000, Böckelmann, Thore wrote:
> Hi Mikko!
>
> Of course it is always better to move forward instead of backwards. But my
> point is that the documented EXTRA_IMAGECMD variable is somehow ignored and
> not passed to mkfs.ext4 as it should be. If it isn't to disable a feature the
> same issue will arise when I try to pass any other option to mkfs.ext4. This
> is what the IMAGE_CMD and EXTRA_IMAGECMD variables were invented for.
This could be a bug, or change in image_types.bbclass behaviour.
Would be nice if you could debug this a bit further, for example
"bitbake -e image" output.
At least IMAGE_CMD:ext4 in current poky master image_types.bbclass
still has
IMAGE_CMD:ext4 = "oe_mkext234fs ext4 ${EXTRA_IMAGECMD}"
which would imply that adding command line arguments with
EXTRA_IMAGECMD should work.
Cheers,
-Mikko
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#64311): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/64311
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/109682386/21656
Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
