On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 at 15:59, Philip Lorenz <philip.lor...@bmw.de> wrote: > Wouldn't we then see version-going-backwards errors in the validation > builds (as the "mainline" builds which contribute to the shared > buildhistory will have higher PRs from PRserv)? We'd like to maximize > our cache reuse so in a perfect world even the write_package_* tasks > could be reused between the builds (which I believe we could do if we > combine hash equivalence with a non-cached packagedata task).
Right. Then I don't know. Like I said, I don't know much about PR side effects. When I was working at a certain car company (that likes to put rotating logos on buildings), we never enabled PR server, as there was no real need for it, or for package management on target images for that matter. Perhaps Michael can chime in, he's the real expert. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#64131): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/64131 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/109194097/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
