On Fri, 2024-10-04 at 04:59 -0700, philip.dawson via Lists.Yoctoproject.Org wrote: > > Now I think about it, there was a bug recently fixed: > > > > https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/commit/bitbake?id=c6b883106bc414312e58fe8c682b3ccc1257f114 > > > > it could be that. Do you have that fix in your build? > > > > That was triggered by differing paths to the layers on disk which could > > differ between your machine and CI. > I don't have that fix, but I also don't have the > clean_checksum_file_path() function at all as having to use Langdale > due to Vendor tooling.
That is a big clue in itself, that function was added for a reason. The reason that code was added may be related to the problem. https://git.openembedded.org/bitbake/commit/?id=5293a1b36eeb89f57577cb709ec7f293909039a1 > > > I don't understand how you have two siginfo files with different sigs > > and the same data. > It's a mystery to me too at this point! Is there anything I can do to > get more information on how it's calculating the task hash? > > I'll try and run across more PCs as well to see if it's just the one > CI machine that's different. I'd try adding the above commit as there were bugs in this area that sound very similar to this. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#63941): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/63941 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/108814179/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
