Hi Etienne

Thanks for the suggestion and I agree, it's a good alternative for
coreutils tools, we must mention it in page.

On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 10:04 AM Etienne Cordonnier
<ecordonn...@snap.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I saw in the latest yocto-status email that this page was created regarding 
> meta-gplv2 replacement:
>
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Meta-gpl2_layer_replacement (thanks Khem)
>
> I'd like to remind of the option to use uutils-coreutils from 
> meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-core/uutils-coreutils as a replacement of 
> GNU coreutils (using PREFERRED_PROVIDER_coreutils = "uutils-coreutils"). It 
> is much easier than transitioning from coreutils to e.g. busybox, because the 
> options used are the same in GNU coreutils and uutils-coreutils, while 
> busybox uses different options.
>
> The caveat at the moment is that uutils-coreutils is still in beta phase, so 
> some flags are still buggy. However the vast majority of the common flags 
> work without any issue.
>
> Étienne
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#63609): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/63609
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/107631336/21656
Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to