Hi Anthony, On Sun 2023-09-24 @ 05:10:41 PM, Anthony Davies wrote: > Thanks for your work Trevor, I have been waiting for this for a while. > > I am new around here so forgive me if I am being impertinent but my only > feedback would be to keep the naming of the machines consistent with the dtb > and uboot defconfig? ie, rock-5b rather then rock5b?
In meta-rockchip we try to follow the naming that the manufacturer gives to the product. Device-tree names come and go, get munged together, and split apart. While the kernel might call it rock-5b today, some new board might come along that causes a refactorisation leading to a whole bunch of renaming. That said the manufacturer isn't 100% clear on the naming of this product. One of the original post introducing the product, https://forum.radxa.com/t/introduce-rock-5-model-b-arm-desktop-level-sbc/8361 shows it written both "Rock5B" and "Rock 5B". >From the manufacturer's own website, they seem to attach the "5" to the "Rock" (without a space) when they're just saying "Rock5", but add a space when they're distinguishing between the "A" and "B" variants: https://wiki.radxa.com/Rock5 https://wiki.radxa.com/Rock5/5b So the naming could go either way. Given that there are more instances of "Rock 5B" we could go with what you suggest. Thanks!
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#61100): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/61100 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/101530319/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
