On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Corey O'Connor <coreyocon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Jeremy Wall <jw...@google.com> wrote:
>> I would add that making the build cabal-dev friendly as well would be
>> a good idea.
>>
>> Having yi-contrib and yi be separate build makes compiling both with
>> cabal-dev less
>> easy than it could be.
>
> I haven't used cabal-dev. What problems do you encounter?

Since cabal-dev compiles everything in a clean environment you have to
pass some commandline flags to
the commands or it recompiles yi every time. Not a big deal but
perhaps a top level cabal config so you
can build it all at one go?

>
> I though cabal-dev auto-magically handled one package depending on the
> source (not installed package) of another package?
>
> If custom yi was compiled given the Yi module source directory instead
> of the yi library yi-contrib *could* be safely folded back into yi.
> Unless a user imports a module into their config the module would not
> need to be compiled.
>
> Cheers,
> Corey
>
>>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:32 AM, Corey O'Connor <coreyocon...@gmail.com> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> I have been considering how to improve the developer experience. The
>>>>> goal is to make the compile/test cycle shorter. There are a lot of way
>>>>> to do this. However I'm thinking of going a bit nuts and integrating
>>>>> the process into yi itself. Code on Yi directly from within Yi and
>>>>> have the re-config process automagically incorporate the changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds like hacker mode huh? Very similar. WE just need to remove the 
>>>>> hack!
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to consider changing the system such that:
>>>>> * yi, the executable, does *not* contain the full yi library. The yi
>>>>> executable would be responsible for compiling the users config in an
>>>>> environment that exposes the appropriate Yi modules and dependent
>>>>> packages.
>>>>> * The Yi modules would always reside in a git clone. The yi executable
>>>>> would know where this git clone resides on disk. Either the system
>>>>> running yi would have a yi clone in a shared location OR the user has
>>>>> their own yi repo clone OR yi checks out a new clone.
>>>>> * On reconfigure the yi executable would: take the serialized out
>>>>> state of Yi, run the recompile and either: Resume the yi that
>>>>> initiated the reconfigure to present errors; Or start a new yi-custom
>>>>> with the serialized state.
>>>>> * The yi executables dependencies would match the base dependencies of
>>>>> the yi library. When the yi executable is installed it would retain
>>>>> the versions of the libraries it was compiled against. This would form
>>>>> the environment that the custom yi would be compiled under.
>>>>>
>>>>> Optionally, the yi executable can compile a set of Yis that use some
>>>>> pre-defined configs. Such as a yi-emacs and yi-vim etc. Which could be
>>>>> used to install a system-wide yi version that requires no setup by the
>>>>> user.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ideas? Thoughts? Yah/neh?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Corey O'Connor
>>>>> coreyocon...@gmail.com
>>>>> http://corebotllc.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Yi development mailing list
>>>>> yi-devel@googlegroups.com
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/yi-devel
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Yi development mailing list
>>>> yi-devel@googlegroups.com
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/yi-devel
>>>
>>> --
>>> Yi development mailing list
>>> yi-devel@googlegroups.com
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/yi-devel
>>
>> --
>> Yi development mailing list
>> yi-devel@googlegroups.com
>> http://groups.google.com/group/yi-devel
>
> --
> Yi development mailing list
> yi-devel@googlegroups.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/yi-devel

-- 
Yi development mailing list
yi-devel@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/yi-devel

Reply via email to