On Mar 15, 7:13 pm, Jeff Wheeler <wheel...@illinois.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Issac Trotts <issac.videos...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I saw it, and I like the general idea. I wonder though if it would be > > simpler to have more focused packages, like yi-gtk and yi-cocoa, at > > least for the things that can't run at the same time. > > I don't feel strongly either way. A lot of the small things in Yi > probably don't warrant extra packages, but doing it at least for GUIs > could make sense. > > Previous work includes yesod and friends (the Yesod category on > Hackage has 24 packages, albeit not all yesod-*) and xmonad-contrib, > which puts everything in one package. > > > I like to make and use things that are well-tested. Is there a penalty > > for enabling it, other than compile time? > > That's fair. Can you verify that the few quickcheck tests (e.g. those > in Yi.Syntax.Tree) only run when --self-check is passed; I'm not > familiar with the testing framework.
My yi binary is hosed right now. I'll check it when I get it working again. ijt@eblap:~/yi$ ./dist/build/yi/yi Configuration '/home/ijt/.yi/yi.hs' changed. Recompiling. Error occurred while loading configuration file. Launching custom binary /home/ijt/.cache/yi/yi-linux-x86_64 yi: /home/ijt/.cache/yi/yi-linux-x86_64: executeFile: invalid argument (Exec format error) > > -- > Jeff Wheeler > > Undergraduate, Electrical Engineering > University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign -- Yi development mailing list yi-devel@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/yi-devel
