Since this report concerns a possible security risk, an incomplete security advisory task has been added while the core security reviewers for the affected project or projects confirm the bug and discuss the scope of any vulnerability along with potential solutions.
It seems like a class D type of bug (e.g., hardening opportunity) according to VMT taxonomy ( https://security.openstack.org/vmt- process.html#incident-report-taxonomy ). ** Also affects: ossa Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ossa Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1611171 Title: re-runs self via sudo Status in Cinder: New Status in Designate: In Progress Status in ec2-api: New Status in gce-api: New Status in Manila: New Status in masakari: New Status in OpenStack Compute (nova): New Status in OpenStack Security Advisory: Incomplete Status in Rally: New Bug description: Hello, I'm looking through Designate source code to determine if is appropriate to include in Ubuntu Main. This isn't a full security audit. This looks like trouble: ./designate/cmd/manage.py def main(): CONF.register_cli_opt(category_opt) try: utils.read_config('designate', sys.argv) logging.setup(CONF, 'designate') except cfg.ConfigFilesNotFoundError: cfgfile = CONF.config_file[-1] if CONF.config_file else None if cfgfile and not os.access(cfgfile, os.R_OK): st = os.stat(cfgfile) print(_("Could not read %s. Re-running with sudo") % cfgfile) try: os.execvp('sudo', ['sudo', '-u', '#%s' % st.st_uid] + sys.argv) except Exception: print(_('sudo failed, continuing as if nothing happened')) print(_('Please re-run designate-manage as root.')) sys.exit(2) This is an interesting decision -- if the configuration file is _not_ readable by the user in question, give the executing user complete privileges of the user that owns the unreadable file. I'm not a fan of hiding privilege escalation / modifications in programs -- if a user had recently used sudo and thus had the authentication token already stored for their terminal, this 'hidden' use of sudo may be unexpected and unwelcome, especially since it appears that argv from the first call leaks through to the sudo call. Is this intentional OpenStack style? Or unexpected for you guys too? (Feel free to make this public at your convenience.) Thanks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1611171/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team Post to : yahoo-eng-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yahoo-eng-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
