Hi Jérôme, thanks for this proposal. See some answers below.
On 09/29/2017 01:11 PM, Jerome Duriez wrote:
a possible "Call" for the workshop (not published anywhere yet).
Now at least it is published
(https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg12581.html).
Maybe you'd like to start a discussion by regular emails to the
yade-devs instead of a public mailing list, for future discussions.
As a side note, and depending on the success to the call (when
launched), I could try to plan some half-day session "YADE specials"
gathering very technical presentations/discussions on YADE itself, or
YADE-based scientific presentations at the scientific margins of the
workshop.
I would thus call it a workshop on "earth dams and levees", with a
"margin session" on yade. It can make a great workshop for sure, but not
really a "2nd yade workshop".
Even you seem to be unsure that a 1/2 day session specific to yade will
actually happen. In this case I doubt that people not interested in
levees would reply to the call at all, and then the margin session has
no reason to be.
To be honest I'm surprised and I don't understand really the need for
such a narrow scope. IRSTEA itself has a substantial activity on slope
stability, snow avalanches, rockfalls, impacts, structural dynamics,
rheology, sediment transport, reinforcement by roots/gtx, and many other
things in which DEM is relevant. Is it bad if the workshop has a scope
broader than your specific position? And if the scope goes beyond
IRSTEA's topics (there are plenty applications of yade in
process/chemical engineering)?
Again, I'm sure such workshop can be very interesting, and I would
happily attend. However it is not clear to me why you would entitle the
event "2nd yade workshop".
Cheers
Bruno
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
