Hi,
I would also call the comment in ViscoFrictPhys "irrelevant", no problem
to remove it.
Bruno
On 06/28/2017 12:13 AM, Jerome Duriez wrote:
Hi,
As said elsewhere, I'm removing
Law2_ScGeom6D_NormalInelasticityPhys_NormalInelasticity from trunk.
The latter is mentionned in the doc of ViscoFrictPhys [*], with a
formulation that even suggests that ViscoFrictPhys was necessary
because of Law2_ScGeom6D_NormalInelasticityPhys_NormalInelasticity.
However, I could not find in the code or in the archive any
explanation how these two classes would be related..
Is there actually anything to take care of in ViscoFrictPhys when
removing Law2_*_NormalInelasticity (outside removing the mention to
Law2_*_NormalInelasticity in the docstring) ?
Jerome
[*] https://yade-dem.org/doc/yade.wrapper.html#yade.wrapper.ViscoFrictPhys
--------------------------------------------------
Jerome Duriez, Research Associate
University of Calgary, Dpt of Civil Engineering
+1 403 220 7367
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
