Hi guys, I would really miss such a functionality. cheers Alex -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Yade-dev [mailto:yade-dev-bounces+alexander.eulitz=iwf.tu-berlin...@lists.launchpad.net] Im Auftrag von Bruno Chareyre Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Juli 2015 12:32 An: yade-dev Betreff: Re: [Yade-dev] [Yade-users] [Question #268476]: Prallel Computation, CentOS & Ubuntu file versions
On 03/07/15 12:00, Anton Gladky wrote: > 2015-07-03 9:26 GMT+02:00 Bruno Chareyre <[email protected]>: >>> I am just thinking, that we should probably deprecate this >>> functionality, because it usually brings only problems. >> Deprecating save()?! > I was thinking about implementing something more simple to save > simulations. For example, only bodies, velocities and maybe interactions. > Thus it could be more portable. AFAIK such a scheme is in LAMMPS. Why not but it will not replace the current save() for resuming simulations as if they were not interrupted. Without proper engines, a list of bodies and interactions is useless. B _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
