Hi Anton, Do you mean to replace boost::python::long_ by groupMask_t? if BODY_GROUP_MASK_ARBITRARY_PRECISION is defined, both argument types (int and bp::long_) are needed.. cheers Jan
2014-06-06 13:07 GMT+02:00 Anton Gladky <[email protected]>: > 2014-06-06 10:47 GMT+02:00 Jan Stránský <[email protected]>: > > I am soory, I am not sure what exactly is the point here :-) The > duplicate > > code in maskOk and maskCompatible? int argument is necessary as some > other > > classes uses ints (like NewtonIntegrator or > > collider::avoidSelfInteractionMask), bp::long_ is optionally for > body-body > > evaluation. Probably I could template it. > > From my point of view we should have just one possible typedef for > groupmask: int or boost, > depending on the BODY_GROUP_MASK_ARBITRARY_PRECISION flag. > > Regards > > Anton >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
