On Mon, 09 Jun 2025 13:02:43 +0200 Krzysztof Hałasa <khal...@piap.pl> said:
> Hi, > > Robert Heller <hel...@deepsoft.com> writes: > > > Yes, there are some of us who can't move to Wayland. In my case FVWM is not > > able to work with Wayland and FVWM2 is my Window Manager of choice. I don't > > know if *I* want to do something like take over Xorg all on my own. > > In my case it's the lack of virtual screens in Wayland > (xrandr --panning): > > $ xrandr > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 12000 x 2800, maximum 16384 x 16384 > DisplayPort-0 connected primary 12000x2800+0+0 (normal left inverted right x > axis y axis) 600mm x 340mm panning 12000x2800+0+0 3840x2160 60.00*+ 30.00 > > :-) > > Perhaps I could help? Just don't know where to start, but it doesn't > look like a big enterprise. > > There was a period in Xfree86 history when it stopped supporting panning > (for a couple of years maybe), and it was a hard experience. that's not a wayland thing. wayland is just a protocol plus associated tooling and libraries to speak that protocol. panning is a compositor thing. if you wanted a compositor to support this then add it to that compositor. as there is no single compositor in the wayland universe, you'd have to make a choice. you could also build your own compositor. -- ------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- Carsten Haitzler - ras...@rasterman.com
