[+cc xorg mailing list] I never received a reply to this. Were my changes incorrect?
I noticed two more oddities which I could not make sense of while implementing support for RandR 1.5: • RRGetMonitors has 6*n+o in its “reply length” member, but later on states (n*24 + o*4) in the “monitors” member. Which of the two is it? • MONITORINFO is described as having length (16 + 4*n), but counting the members I arrive at (24 + 4*n). On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Michael Stapelberg <mich...@stapelberg.ch> wrote: > Hey Keith, > > while trying to implement RandR 1.5 in xcb-proto, I’ve stumbled over a > couple little inconsistencies with randrproto.txt. Find attached a patch > which, hopefully, makes things clearer. > > I’m sending this directly to you since you’re the person with the most > insight on your own intentions, so you’re the best reviewer for the patch, > I think. > > -- > Best regards, > Michael > -- Best regards, Michael
_______________________________________________ xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: %(user_address)s
