Am 27.11.2019 04:52, schrieb Chen Gang: > Oh, sorry, XFlush should be replaced by _XFlush. >
it looks reasonable, NTL can you provide an example works.c vs. not_works.c ? re, wh > On 2019/11/27 上午11:47, Chen Gang wrote: >> The global (un)lock xserver operations will have effect to the whole >> system, and all the other gui apps have to be blocked, so the operations >> should not be buffered, or may cause sync issue, e.g. reboot machine. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <cheng...@emindsoft.com.cn> >> --- >> src/GrServer.c | 1 + >> src/UngrabSvr.c | 1 + >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/src/GrServer.c b/src/GrServer.c >> index c4c62be..59ed03a 100644 >> --- a/src/GrServer.c >> +++ b/src/GrServer.c >> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ XGrabServer (register Display *dpy) >> _X_UNUSED register xReq *req; >> LockDisplay(dpy); >> GetEmptyReq(GrabServer, req); >> + XFlush(dpy); /* For Global (un)lock ops must be sent quickly */ >> UnlockDisplay(dpy); >> SyncHandle(); >> return 1; >> diff --git a/src/UngrabSvr.c b/src/UngrabSvr.c >> index 20ad9aa..4b0ffca 100644 >> --- a/src/UngrabSvr.c >> +++ b/src/UngrabSvr.c >> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ XUngrabServer ( >> >> LockDisplay(dpy); >> GetEmptyReq(UngrabServer, req); >> + XFlush(dpy); /* For Global (un)lock ops must be sent quickly */ >> UnlockDisplay(dpy); >> SyncHandle(); >> return 1; >> > > > _______________________________________________ > xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
