Am 17.05.2019 21:51, schrieb Thomas Dickey: > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 04:26:10PM +0200, walter harms wrote: >> >> >> Am 17.05.2019 13:01, schrieb James Larrowe: >>> I use _WIN32 or __WIN32__ depending on the context. >>> >> my idea was to reduce the number of defines :) >> >> the problem is that i have no way to test what would happen if >> i replace WIN32 with _WIN32. >> >> So the question is left, is WIN32 still used ? > > sure - there was a recent update in Intrinsic.c which relies upon that slice. >
Actually that made me investigate the use. There is a single use for _WIN32 in NextEvent.c making this to WIN32 would clean the table, but i can not test. #ifdef _WIN32 typedef long suseconds_t; #endif re, wh > _______________________________________________ > xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development > Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel > Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
