On 03/01/2017 10:33 AM, nobili, philippe wrote:
For the record, it seems that the assembly processor (version 1_0_0) may generate
invalid DocBook-5 documents in presence of <relationships> between topic.
Indeed, the <relationships>[...]</relationships> element is realized into an itemized
list which is placed at the end of the topic, that is possibly after a <section> element
for instance (we have a topic with two sections).
That's right. We have chosen the simplest, most straightforward, strategy.
It does not prevent the realized DocBook document from being converted thought.
This is NOT a bug. This is explicitly allowed by the DocBook assembly
specification.
Excerpts of http://tdg.docbook.org/tdg/5.1/ch06.html#structures
---
It is important to observe that the realized structure is often, but not
necessarily, a valid DocBook document. What is important is not it's
validity from an authoring perspective, but rather it's validity with
respect to what the downstream processor is expecting.
---
The realized document does not have to be a valid, self-contained,
DocBook 5.1 document. Suffice for it to be convertible to other formats
by the DocBook XSL stylesheets.
In other words, the realized document must not be considered to be a
source DocBook 5.1 document but just a temporary, intermediate file.
The DocBook XSL stylesheets have no problems whatsoever with our
translation of <relationships> in the realized document. Therefore we
consider that what we do is OK.
--
XMLmind XML Editor Support List
xmleditor-support@xmlmind.com
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support
