On 03/25/2015 09:14 PM, Jeff Hooker wrote:
I just read your message more closely and noticed this:
* Common pitfall: for an element to be displayed with the style of the selected
profile or with the style of the unselected profile, this element must have
*all* the profiling attributes set on it.
This means that the visual "profile" filtering and the actual representation of
the data that would emerge from a publishing job could be very different does it not?
Yes. The DITA spec says:
---
When deciding whether to include or exclude a particular element, a
processor should evaluate each attribute, and then evaluate the set of
attributes.
* If all the values in a single attribute evaluate to "exclude",
the attribute evaluates to "exclude".
* If *any* single attribute evaluates to exclude, the element is
excluded.
---
Therefore when the profiles specified in the ".profiles" file use 2
profiling attributes or more, then a element may be indeed not be
rendered on screen as being part of the selected profile or any
unselected profile, but still be filtered out when converting the
document to PDF, RTF, HTML, etc.
Before saying that this makes the "Easy Profiling" add-on useless,
1) the "Easy Profiling" add-on has several other features in terms of
profiling attribute editing and validation.
2) the "Easy Profiling" add-on can also style individual profiling
attributes.
See http://www.xmlmind.com/xmleditor/_distrib/doc/profiling/index.html
Of course, may be we'll change the behavior related to the above common
pitfall in a future version of XXE. May be this will even require
differentiating profile rendering in DocBook and profile rendering in
DITA. Not sure. Needs more thinking about it.
In the event that you are interested, here are my test files.
Your test files work fine with v6.0. I've tested that.
The problems you have with v6.0 but not with v6.1 probably come from
your working environment.
--
XMLmind XML Editor Support List
xmleditor-support@xmlmind.com
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support
