Leif H. wrote:
Since XMLmind offers HTML5 and XHTML5 as options in its New document
templates, does this mean that you consider that you now "fully support
(X)HTML 5"?
We fully support HTML5 in its XML form. Our XML editor cannot support
HTML5 in its HTML form.
Regardless of your answer, could you please add<!DOCTYPE html> to both
the HTML5 template and the XHTML5 template? Because, as for HTML5, the
code is invalid without it.
"Invalid" is a bit strong as a word for some HTML.
(I see that that code in reality is XHTML
code, so in reality you try to be polyglot here.) As for the XHTML5
template, then the DOCTYPE is optional, but would be wise to have in
case the doc becomes served as text/html.
Your are 100% right. We would *really* like to add <!DOCTYPE html> to
all our document templates. Unfortunately our XML parser rejects this
declaration as non-well formed. We have not yet found a simple way to
circumvent this.
---
PS: This open source software *may* interest you:
---
XHTML 5 resources comprising a robust, self-contained, W3C XML Schema
for XHTML 5 and highly parameterizable, easy to customize, XSLT 2
stylesheets allowing to transform XHTML 1.0, 1.1, 5.0 to XSL-FO.
---
http://www.xmlmind.com/xhtml5_resources.shtml
--
XMLmind XML Editor Support List
xmleditor-support@xmlmind.com
http://www.xmlmind.com/mailman/listinfo/xmleditor-support
