Hi Daniel, Thanks for the reply. I am also not based in US, so little confused with these. AFIK, some open source projects(ex:Apache <http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/>listed all its projects and its ECCN) already mentioned this. That helps in such scenarios.
Regards Sunil On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Daniel Veillard <veill...@redhat.com>wrote: > As far as I know, export control is to be required by the company > exporting the software. Your legal team should look at it, including > the fact that the software is open source, if you also publish all the > modifications made to it, it can simplify the process a lot, but YMMV. > > Right now being based in China, I have no problem exporting it to > the USA, again check for your specific situation ;-P > > Daniel > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:25:45AM +0530, Sunil P John wrote: > > Hi, > > I am using libxml2 library version 2.9.0.1 for xml parsing in our > component > > and redistributing lixml2 binary along with our product. Now the legal > team > > of our company asked me the following question > > 1. Is ECCN (Export control classification number) applicable to libxml2? > > 2. If yes, what is the ECCN for libxml2? > > 3. Also whats the classification source for libxml2? > > > > I tried searching in the archives and other forums, but couldn't get any > > pointers. Hope anyone can help me here. > > > > Regards > > Zunil > > > _______________________________________________ > > xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ > > xml@gnome.org > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml > > > -- > Daniel Veillard | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat > veill...@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ > http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ > -- Zunil
_______________________________________________ xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/ xml@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml